Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#34434 05/07/18 09:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Hi,

I just bought a 2" Douglas and a 2" White chisel from the 1900s and neither have handles. Does anyone have pictures of what the original handles would have looked like?

Thanks,

Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 463
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 463
The White catalog shows clearly that the taper of the socket continues onto the handle and bends the slope into a curve, however this is a handle that is perfect in appearance but is lacking as a hard working tool. My choice is for a greater diameter, lack of contact between the socket rim and the handle's shoulder and no contact with the ring and the upper shoulder. Heavy driving will cause the socket and ring to be driven into the handle causing splitting.

http://www.blackburntools.com/articles/rose-tools-catalog-archives/pdfs/white-1913-carpenters.pdf

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Hi Roger,

This link is excellent! Thank you so much. This will make it much easier for me to turn the new handles with the historic(original) in mind and with my personal touch.

Thanks again,

Bruce

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Make sure that the handle does not bottom out on the socket or the ring. That will surely split the handle.


Member, Timber Framers Guild

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
graymatter, pgwalton, BeamCrawler, minimaple, Faber_Americanus
5210 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.33 Page Time: 0.027s Queries: 23 (0.016s) Memory: 2.9783 MB (Peak: 3.5635 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-09-16 11:25:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS