Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 49
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 49
I've been working on a project in Parke County, IN which entails the redesign of a covered bridge recently torched by arsonists. It is a 204 foot double span burr arch, and I've been trying to make it as historically accurate as possible to get full funding as a historical project. It has been recently requested that I also provide some computer analysis of the project so they can hopefully set a higher load limit (and of course, get more money). I know joints experience a semi-rigid behaviour (not fixed or pinned) but I am at a complete loss as to good valid results from any structural analysis type of program. Has anyone done similar things with any success, or know of a way besides computer analysis to get a reasonable (not overly-conservative) solution? I am open to any ideas.

Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 56
B
Administrator
Administrator
B Offline
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 56
Joe:

Ed Levin is THE person to talk to on this subject. See his article in Timber Framing # 25 on engineering the Speed River bridge in Guelph, Ontario (a former Guild project) as well as various posts in this BB including:

http://www.tfguild.org/ubbcgibin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=000005

For more info, use the search box on the first page of the web site on the term "speed river".

Brian


Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.33 Page Time: 0.030s Queries: 18 (0.013s) Memory: 2.9657 MB (Peak: 3.5632 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-09-16 16:57:05 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS