Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#4812 11/10/06 03:21 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
By how much can I notch a 6" x 6" purlin as it goes across the top of bent half way between ridge and plate whilst still retaining its full structural strength

#4813 11/10/06 08:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 40
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 40
Greener,

Rule of thunb is 1/3 max, so it is 2" for 6" deep purlin. If you run the engineering math you might get more than that in some cases, depending on load conditions (snow, wind) and purlin support/overhang.

Michal Zajic
TFDesign


Mr. Michal Zajic Timber Frame Design http://www.tfdesign.cz
#4814 11/10/06 07:36 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
So if I understand correctly - the notched purlins bearing on the bent/frame has been reduced to a depth of 4" even though the purlins structural required depth has been say calculated to be 6", my understanding of structural engineering is limited could you explain to me why if a purlin which needs a 6" depth between supports can be reduced to 4" at the bearing points?

#4815 11/11/06 05:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 574
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 574
God knows I've notched many a purlin, most of them 6x6, and like Michal said, they were taken down to 4", with a 4" lap (of course, the lap length depends on the size of the principle rafter). But these were full 6x6, not 5.5 x 5.5; keep that in mind. And from what I understand about wood is that a 2" notch in a 6" timber still holds its weight distribution properly - the weight is transfered onto the principle rafter at the joint.

Also, what length are the purlins spanning? This wiil make a difference in whether or not you will need a center notch, and thus a rafter to notch it to.

Keep in mind, I am not an engineer...I've just dealt with A LOT of purlins!

Good Luck!
*K

#4816 11/12/06 01:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 63
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 63
If I follow the question correctly - you need the full strength of the purlin in mid-span for reasons of stiffness against bending. The depth required at each bearing has more to do with absolute failure in shear.

Most timbers would have excessive flex or mid-span failure long before they break in shear at a tip - therefore the mid span needs more "meat" than the bearing at tenons or laps.

Oversimplified, but I hope it makes sense.

Pete

#4817 11/12/06 10:20 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
Yes that does make sense thanks.


Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.33 Page Time: 0.034s Queries: 26 (0.017s) Memory: 2.9851 MB (Peak: 3.5625 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-09-16 21:01:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS