Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 306
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 306
Hello,

Not to be flip about your point, that's an interesting question but it makes certain assumptions about what it is your after doesn't it? Knowing you followed the Poland project I wonder what you thought about Mikkel Johansen's ideas about leaving a bit of space in the work for the human element, following on from what David Pye writes about as "workmanship of risk", not to mention Soetsu Yanagi? Having read over his statement a few times, and what Tim O’Brien had to say in rebuttal there, I find my approach has more in common with Johansen's.

But, ok, in more direct response, and in all seriousness, I guess the situation would account for a lot.

Greetings,

Don Wagstaff

Last edited by Cecile en Don Wa; 07/09/11 11:09 AM.
#26771 07/09/11 05:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
I agree 100% with what Mikkel Johansen said. One can be accurate, quick, and efficient.

This topic relates to the recent query on efficient joinery decisions.

Mikkel's speech, at the bottom of the page:
http://mcnorlander.wordpress.com/2011/06/15/gleanings-1/

#26791 07/11/11 07:08 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 306
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 306
Hello,

I misread that thinking it was an existing situation where the brace must go. Excuses.
But I would hook the tendons also because hanging it by the tail, you could pull it off.

Greetings,

Don Wagstaff

Last edited by Cecile en Don Wa; 07/11/11 07:12 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc, Paul Freeman 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.33 Page Time: 0.023s Queries: 21 (0.012s) Memory: 2.9887 MB (Peak: 3.5601 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-09-17 03:16:14 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS