Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 965
K
Member
Member
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 965
Up until now I have been using the "allowable" stress values shown in the NDS tables included in the Timber Frame Design book in my structural models.

I note that the values shown, for example, ultimate horizontal shear in the Wood Handbook are between 10 to 20 times higher.

I am currently working with a client who is required to use limit state analysis and this seems to permit allowable stresses to rise higher than NDS allowable.

Can anybody shed some light on this please ?

Regards
Ken Hume http://www.clik.to/WorldofWood


Looking back to see the way ahead !
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 67
M
MTF Offline
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 67
My experience has been that most limit analysis approaches use a higher allowable than the allowable stress approach, but use load factors on the other side of the equation. This would be similar to LRFD (load resistance factor design) in steel design. Although I am an engineer, I'm not the leading authority in this area; perhaps others can provide additional insight.


Moderated by  mdfinc 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
graymatter, pgwalton, BeamCrawler, minimaple, Faber_Americanus
5210 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Release build 20251126)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.33 Page Time: 0.031s Queries: 18 (0.014s) Memory: 2.9647 MB (Peak: 3.5635 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-09-16 09:46:49 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS