Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
A 6x6 based timber frame? #32863 03/27/15 05:07 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
R
RedOak Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
Although I've been perusing the TFG forum for years, I don't get a lot of time for it; hence, the lack of posts.

Regardless, I'd like to get some feedback on a question I was recently asked. In short, I've been asked whether or not a frame -- based on 6 x 6 timbers -- can be cut to support a small- to medium-sized utility building (roughly 12 x 20). For the sake of speed, pre-engineered roof trusses will sit atop the frame, so the frame will not be a bent-type design and, furthermore, it is understood that the plate beams themselves will have to be of a greater dimension ( i.e., 6 x 9).

Considering that a pressure-treated sill plate is what I would prefer to use in this design, I will probably be restricted to 6 x 6 timbers from the lumber yard and, considering that the actual dimensions of said timbers is more like 5.5 x 5.5, I'm a bit concerned about the strength of square-rule joints in such a small piece of [soft] wood.

I was taught to opt for 2" mortise/tenons in softwood, so the fact that most of the timbers in the proposed frame are actually 5.5-inches wide (on each face) brings the one-third frame rule directly into question. I'm also a bit concerned about the general lack of relish when pegging 5.5 x 5.5 frame members together, as well.

I've seen a design for small buildings where half-laps were employed for most of the connections. In this particular design, the half-laps for the posts are cut 3/4" short -- at the bottom and the top -- to allow for shrinkage of both the sill and the plate beams. Obviously, this means that half of the post bears on the sill beam, while the other half has no contact with the foundation. In other words, half of the post simply hovers above the floor and waits for the sill beam to shrink.

By the way, the foundation for this building -- a raised frame made out of dimensional lumber and connected to treated pilings -- is already in place.

I'd like to read a few thoughts on putting a small frame such as the one I've [attempted to] describe together.

Thanks for your time ...

Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32864 03/27/15 01:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,685
J
Jim Rogers Online Confused
Member
Online Confused
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,685
Normally with a 6x6 timber you would make your mortise and tenon 1/4 the thickness. That means your mortise and tenon would be 1 1/2" instead of 2".

I don't know if that helps you or not.

Jim Rogers


Whatever you do, have fun doing it!
Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32866 03/27/15 02:37 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 305
T
timberwrestler Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 305
That has Dutch framing style written all over it. A Dutch (house) frame has bents that are closely spaced, generally 3-4'. The tie beams are the only floor joists, that is there are no joists running between the bents. Certain 2x T&G decking (generally SYP and DF) can span between the bents. This is the standard frame workshop taught by Jack Sobon and Dave Carlon and Hancock Shaker Village.

I agree with Jim on the mortise. Maybe even 1.25".

Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32867 03/27/15 03:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Dave Shepard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
I was thinking Dutch as well.


Member, Timber Framers Guild
Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32869 03/27/15 06:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
R
RedOak Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
Thanks for the replies, folks. Is the "Dutch" frame mentioned herein based on small 6 x 6 (5.5 x 5.5 actual) softwood timbers? If so, I'll certainly look into that design for guidance...It doesn't hurt that Jack Sobon teaches it, either. That's a pretty good endorsement, in my mind.

Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32870 03/27/15 07:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Dave Shepard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
The Hancock frame up until I think 2009 uses 6x6 plates and posts, with 6x8 tie beams and 7x8 sills. If you are not putting joist pockets in the sills, you could probably get away with smaller timbers. From 2010 on, the frame was shrunk from 14'x16' to 12'x14'. I know the rafters are smaller, 4"x5" and the posts I think are smaller.

2009 Hancock frame with a 12'x16' addition that I designed and cut:



2014 Hancock frame:



I think you can click on the image to get a larger view. You can see the close bent spacing that allows smaller timbers to be used.


Member, Timber Framers Guild
Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32871 03/28/15 01:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,685
J
Jim Rogers Online Confused
Member
Online Confused
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,685
On the 12x14' Dutch style shed he uses 6x6 posts and 4x6 rafters. On the 14x16' Dutch style house he uses 6x6 posts and 5x5 rafters.

Jim Rogers

PS. I have cut several of these 14x16' frames, but as yet to cut the 12'x14' frame.


Whatever you do, have fun doing it!
Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32872 03/28/15 08:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
R
RedOak Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
Thanks again for the posts, folks. Clicking on either photo links you to a series of photos. I hope you don't mind, Dave, but I went through your "album."

What kind of mill do you own? What species is that incredible log being skidded out of the forest with the Timberjack (the log requiring a helper axle)? What kind of a timber did the bottom of that log render? It must have been quite the beam.

Looks like the ideal setting for a timber framer...beautiful.

Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32873 03/28/15 01:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Dave Shepard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
I have a 2008 LT40 Super with wireless remote. That long log is a white pine. I took it whole just to see if I could. It would have made a 68'-6" 12"x12" with no wane. I ended up cutting it up into smaller bits for a local framer.


Member, Timber Framers Guild
Re: A 6x6 based timber frame? [Re: RedOak] #32874 03/28/15 10:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
R
RedOak Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
Wireless remote? Man, I think about the benefits of that evolution in milling just about every time I walk around the end of my mill to square cants.

As for the log, we had a huge EWP blown over in a microburst back in 2008 that rendered a nice 12 x 12. It ended up being about 24-feet long, however. Nothing like that monster in your photo -- good on ya.' Is that particular log out of your own woodlot, Dave?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
HFT, Wrongthinker, kaymaxi, RLTJohn, fendrishi
5134 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.033s Queries: 17 (0.010s) Memory: 3.2157 MB (Peak: 3.3977 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-29 05:23:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS