Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Principal/Common Rafter Frame #15415 05/13/08 01:38 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 21
C
cbecker940 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 21
I am looking for some feedback on the two styles of frames.

Drawings

Thanks

Re: Principal/Common Rafter Frame [Re: cbecker940] #15420 05/13/08 12:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 56
CarlosCabanas Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 56
In your drawings you don't have one with purlins. I prefer the system with purlins and bents as you can use dovetails to help hold alll the bents together when the top plate is not continuous.

Carlos


I cut it twice, and it's still too short!!
Re: Principal/Common Rafter Frame [Re: CarlosCabanas] #15426 05/13/08 07:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 603
brad_bb Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 603
I don't exactly understand how your rafters meet in the first pic, and I'm not sure how the joinery is done in the same place in the second pic.
Carlos, If I were him I'd look at doing it like the frame we did where the king post extends to the top and the rafters are let into the kingpost as well as a ridge beam between bents is also let into the king post. The ridge beam(is that the right name since it is not continious?), is cut at the top with the angle of each side of the roof. I may be biased on that design, but is does seem more effecient and symetric to me, eh Carlos?
Check out the kingpost in the pics of this forestry forum post.
http://www.forestryforum.com/board/index.php/topic,29021.40.html


Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.061s Queries: 15 (0.024s) Memory: 3.1184 MB (Peak: 3.5814 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-02 20:05:03 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS