Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Spine beam [Re: Ken Hume] #17171 10/25/08 12:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,198
N
northern hewer Offline
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,198
HI everyone, I would like to take a stab at this unusual term

I expect that if this mortise was located in a lower timber of a barn door opening it might have been used to secure a pulley arrangement that would have been used during the haying harvest or for other chores that needed to secure and redirect a rope used for hoisting produce into an upper loft area.

It may also have been used in mills as an ideal anchoring system for hoisting goods of all kinds.

It may have been placed right above a strategic location where periodic hoisting was needed and therefore a permanent tethering point was needed such as over a waterwheel pit or the log entrance into a muley mill saw entranceway.

NH

Re: Spine beam [Re: northern hewer] #17174 10/25/08 02:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
C
collarandhames Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Northern,
Can you furnish a link or picture for us newbies?

Re: Spine beam [Re: Ken Hume] #17194 10/27/08 08:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OK, sounds like frame raising, but perhaps not "bents"... maybe longitudinal sections? ...to assist in crosstie fitting? (Right before they drawbored?)

Do you have a picture for us, Ken?


Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Re: Spine beam [Re: OurBarns1] #17208 10/28/08 08:35 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
K
Ken Hume Offline
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
Hi,

The use of the term "pulley mortice" must be one of the earliest defined terms in carpentry having first appeared in Francis Price's book - The British Carpenter or a Treatise on Carpentry (1st edition 1733). In that book he provides an illustration of a floor in which every fourth floor joist is made deeper than the rest so that they can be used to hold in place short ceiling joists between them. Because the short ceiling joists are put into place after the main joists have already been fixed this requires that their short stub tenons are inserted and then swung into "pulley mortices" - a short radial slot that deepens so that the tenon takes up a final resting position that is more or less as per a normal mortice.

To confuse matters the term "pulley mortice" was later changed to "chase mortice" and so by 1850 James Newlands employs both terms as meaning the same in his Carpenter's Assistant.

In "The Modern Carpenter and Joiner" by Harry Newbold (Ed.) [undated but probably about 1910] he employs the term "chase mortice" for the same arrangement that Price uses for "pulley mortice" and certainly his sketches appear to match the description that Price gives for "pulley mortice".

In "English Historic Carpentry" Cecil Hewett (1980) also makes reference to this type of mortice as being a "chase mortice".

It seems therefore that there is a well established history of use of the terms "pulley mortice" or later equivalent "chase mortice" to describe short radial slots made to accomodate and fix ceiling joists.

Unfortunately, to make term definition more difficult, it has been noted that sometimes long continuous slots have been used in the sides of tie beams that were inserted specifically to hold up new ceilings (in order to cover over what was previously known to be an open roof) and a slightly different technique is employed where a long continuous slot or chase is made in the lower sides(s) of inserted tie beams and then these are used to both to house and hold up the ceiling joists. This "slot", "chase" or "open" mortice technique was employed by carpenters in the pre Price era i.e. before 1733 and as such there does not as yet appear to be a generally accepted definition for this approach to carpentry but one thing does appear to be clear and that is that the term "pulley mortice" refers to a series of interrupted radial mortices and therefore it does not apply to a continuous slot or chase.

Some New England equivalents to these continuous slots can be found on the undersides of gable end tie beams or overhung wallplates with these slots or rebates being used to secure the ends of applied vertical cladding. Does this slot have a defined term ?

I shall circulate a copy of Harry Newbold's illustration separately to interested parties and maybe Jim Rogers would be so kind as to make a follow up post of same so that all can see and understand what is otherwise a very "wordy" post.

Regards

Ken Hume


Looking back to see the way ahead !
Re: Spine beam [Re: Ken Hume] #17222 10/28/08 10:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
J
Jim Rogers Offline
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
Here is what Ken wanted to show:



Whatever you do, have fun doing it!
Re: Spine beam [Re: Jim Rogers] #17228 10/29/08 12:36 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 332
H
Housewright Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
H
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 332
I find the variation in the meaning and spelling of these terms very interesting. My favorite dictionary (The Encycloaedic Dictionary, Boston, 1896) gives the definition of a 'pully-mortice=chace-mortice". Note the spellings.It defines the mortise under "chase-mortice" and "chace=chase".

Thanks for the spine beam info.

How about that summertree!

Jim


The closer you look the more you see.
"Heavy timber framing is not a lost art" Fred Hodgson, 1909
Re: Spine beam [Re: Housewright] #17233 10/29/08 07:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
K
Ken Hume Offline
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
Hi Jim x 2,

Thanks for the illustration post and the additional terminology reference. Its interesting that the American term lines up with the UK term during victorian times.

Re summer tree - I previous took a stab at answering this - was there something else that I missed ? The term "tree" is oft times used in milling circles e.g. crown tree, cross trees, etc.

Regards

Ken Hume


Looking back to see the way ahead !
Re: Spine beam [Re: Ken Hume] #17248 10/30/08 08:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
Thanks for sharing Ken.

Another one for the glossary (I see you've added it already).

I've never seen this type of mortise here in old barns. Was it used primarily in houses? And the fact that many other forum members hadn't heard of it makes me think it didn't make it over on this side of the Atlantic.

Seems like a difficult joint to cut... why not just make a "dap" or notch in the summer beam and drop the smaller members in from above? Kind of how purlins are installed. Ever seen this "Pulley joinery" in a roof?

And I don't know why, but something tells me this has roots in ship building ??


Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Re: Spine beam [Re: OurBarns1] #17249 10/30/08 10:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
K
Ken Hume Offline
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
Hi Don,

I have not seen this type of joint on that many occasions and not yet in any barns. I understand that this was a Georgian building practice used mainly in the construction of floors in large brick built town buildings and so to this end it will probably also manifest itself in buildings in downtown Boston or any other similar east coast USA towns since they too fit the date citeria.

Regards

Ken Hume


Looking back to see the way ahead !
Re: Spine beam [Re: Ken Hume] #17256 10/31/08 09:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
I find the differences between barn joinery and house construction interesting. It appears some joints may have been common to both building practices while others were more exclusive to one or the other.

Perhaps the pulley mortise was a bit too ornate for a barn.

Or maybe a pulley mortise worked well in a house remodel when additional structural members were needed but taking apart the structure to insert them was problematic.



Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.155s Queries: 15 (0.135s) Memory: 3.2208 MB (Peak: 3.5815 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-06 14:29:38 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS