Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
1840's Barn meeting current code #17721 01/21/09 03:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
R
RCB Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
This is my first post, so thanks in advance for the assistance.

I have an opportunity to purchase an 1840's timberframe barn in Ontario. It is a 30 X 40 feet, with 4 bents. The cross beams clear the entire 30 foot span with no posts. The beams are 12 X 12 pine. There is also a "Swing beam" that is 19 inches high in the middle and tapers to 12 inches on the end.

I'm not sure I've given enough information, but my question is how would this design meet current requirements. We are looking to move the barn to Alberta, it would have a metal roof, but I don't have details on the pitch or truss design. The current design has 10X12inch purlins (spelling?).

Thanks.

Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: RCB] #17738 01/21/09 10:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 603
brad_bb Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 603
I'd like to see some pics of that 30 foot clear span and the configuration that does it. First question is, are you trying to turn it into a home? I assume someone told you it "wouldn't meet code". Specifically what aspect are we talking about? Snow load? Structural? Electrical? Heating effeciency? If you're turning it into a home, a certified engineer in your county should analize the design to determine if the structure is sufficient for the snow loac for your area, the live loads you will add for second or third floors etc. If there is a problem, they can suggest ways to add to the structure to meet those requirements. Hopefully if they are good and experienced with timberframe (find and pay someone who is) they can do it so the additions are subtle, or fit in with the style of the frame. If by pass code they meant the specific condition of the timbers, they can be inspected and graded if necessary, and any sub-par components replaced, or damaged components replaced. Sil timbers in barns are not typically reused due to their proximity to the ground and moisture. The bottoms of post can be cut and the height shortened, or a repair to the post made. Perhaps the person could have meant that the height of the barn would not be allowed where you planned to re-erect it? In towns there are often height limits in residential areas. You definitely need to ask more questions and gather more information. Barn frames have been reclaimed and used many times.

Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: brad_bb] #17743 01/22/09 01:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
R
RCB Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks for your response. I'll try to clarify. My concern is that I like the idea of a 30 foot clear span with no supporting beams. However, I'm concerned about meeting snow loads. The frame I'm looking at was raised in 1880 and put on a block foundation. The condition of the timbers are in perfect condition thanks to some additions on the side of the barn that made the walls "interior" walls.

I am looking at adding a second floor to a portion of the frame for a master beadroom / loft.

I'll try to get some pictures this weekend and some better measurements.

Thanks for your insights.

Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: RCB] #17746 01/22/09 05:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 850
mo Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 850
Welcome RCB,

Not to familiar with Canada and their provinces and such. are we on the same latitude from its original home to the new one? First thoughts and (in my opinion) if their is no decay and it has been standing since 1840.... put it back together and work around it. it has worked this far.

By the way if a structure has been standing from 1840 and it doesn't meet current requirements than the current requirements are bogus (in my opinion).

p.s. yes purlins

p.p.s. what is a swing beam?

p.p.p.s if you can somehow propose that you are extending the life of something old, you might find a loophole to shoot down "current" requirements.

Last edited by mo; 01/22/09 05:25 AM.
Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: mo] #17747 01/22/09 05:49 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 850
mo Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 850
hi, was reading again. 10X12 purlins?! is this right and if it is what are the size of the principal rafters they are joined to?

Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: RCB] #17751 01/22/09 02:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 344
Joel McCarty Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 344
There is a compelling logic in your question: if it's stood for 170 years, what could codes possibly have to say that is meaningful?

My cautions would include; changes in the weather, and in the use of the structure, and deterioration of foundation and timber over time. (We say a major, major change in the snow loads in NH a few years back; new numbers developed from 50 years of observation.)

All this sidesteps any notion of life-safety-health codes that the revitalized structure might reasonably be expected to meet.

Here in Live Free or Die New Hampshire, a fellow can reasonably expect to be able to build any old thing for his own use, but still be properly held to modern standards when building something for public use or sale to strangers.


Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: mo] #17752 01/22/09 02:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
It sounds like a beautiful barn. 10x12 purlins? Principal purlins with common rafters? We will see.


Tim

Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: mo] #17758 01/22/09 05:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 217
D
Don P Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 217
Some current requirements are bogus, but... if the use of a structure changes there is good reason to look it over. I've been in one barn who's broken beams were being supported by the feed bunks. I doubt in a conversion those would be there. After looking through a barn on a property a friend moved to I told him to stay out and to keep his boys out. Although it had stood for over a century it collapsed within the year. I've worked on several old homes that had joists that were well overspanned. Two I can think of were downright scary. They had stood for over a century and the angels were getting tired of flapping. We live considerably heavier now than we used to and with different serviveability tolerances. None of those sound like this barn but a critical eye is money well spent.

Google "swing beam barn" and you'll find lots of info. Here's a couple.
http://www.howellfarm.org/farm/barns/fish_barn/lessons/anatomy%20fact%20sheet.pdf

http://www.circlerockinc.com/images/gallery/gallery-9-lg.jpg

Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: Don P] #17767 01/23/09 02:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
welcome RCB:

What comes to my mind is a 40' building w/ only 4 bents... that's a large spacing of ~13' or more. Perhaps that's why it has such beefy timbers.

Of course, the steeper the roof the better it will handle any snow loads. The code requirements for rafters typically decrease as pitch increases.

Again, that's a large bent span. Perhaps even more of a consideration w/ those softwood timbers. But there's a lot to be said for the test of time.


Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Re: 1840's Barn meeting current code [Re: mo] #17768 01/23/09 02:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
R
RCB Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks to everyone for their comments.

Here's a link to a website that shows a picture of a similar barn to the one I'm looking at. The top right hand picture of the "1840's Moffat Barn" shows a large horizontal timber that is conciderable thicker in the middle and tapers to the end. I believe this is a "Swing Beam"

http://www.historiclumber.ca/salvage2.html

In fact the rafter and purlin system is similar to this barn as well.

I'll try to get some additional details to share. Appreciate the help.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
HFT, Wrongthinker, kaymaxi, RLTJohn, fendrishi
5134 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.034s Queries: 16 (0.008s) Memory: 3.2181 MB (Peak: 3.3982 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-28 13:20:04 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS