Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 7 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: OurBarns1] #19535 05/07/09 02:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 344
Joel McCarty Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 344
Far OUT!

What technology made that video, please?

This is something the TFG must master.



Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: Joel McCarty] #19537 05/07/09 02:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
Testing the new "File Manager"

Pics of the old jail, built 1719 and visited @ TTRAG '09 in York, ME.

Attached Files
11-101_0131.JPG (69.18 KB, 511 downloads)
12-101_0129.JPG (45.92 KB, 530 downloads)

Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: OurBarns1] #19538 05/07/09 02:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
"Becket, we have a problem..."


Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: OurBarns1] #19539 05/07/09 03:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
J
Jim Rogers Offline
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
You've got that right, page not found.....


Whatever you do, have fun doing it!
Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: Joel McCarty] #19542 05/07/09 04:12 PM
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 245
Tom Cundiff Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 245
Originally Posted By: Joel McCarty
Far OUT!

What technology made that video, please?

This is something the TFG must master.




I want/need one too. Yes, we must master.


Not all who wander are lost.
Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: Ken Hume] #19549 05/08/09 01:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
Originally Posted By: Ken Hume
Hi Don,

Re Jack's observations about exact 18" separations on scoring marks this rang a bell inside me. A few years back when I was doing recording work in the Bishop's Camera roof at Farnham Castle I noted that the 6" wide x 5" deep rafters were set exactly on 18" centres. Regards

Ken Hume


Ken, this is an aside, but in the video, Jack stated the juggles were 16" not 18" apart... "16 inches on-center" was his comment.


Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: OurBarns1] #19552 05/08/09 06:55 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
K
Ken Hume Offline
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 961
Hi Don,

I am sorry - that mistake was a result of a case of early morning Stanley rule dyslexia. I should of course stated 16".

The Bishop's Camera roof rafter spacing is also 16" as well and very conveniently this works out at 3 x 16 = 48 i.e. 4 ft spacing every 3rd rafter. That means that the nominal space between the rafters is now only 10". A skinny man (not me) can climb through the gap between the collars and into the space above between the scissor braces - just!

I think that I have managed to get it right this time - I hope!

Regards

Ken Hume

Last edited by Ken Hume; 05/08/09 06:56 AM.

Looking back to see the way ahead !
Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: Ken Hume] #19553 05/08/09 10:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
I almost would bet the key figure is 48" and this is split into the 3 segments. Does this fit into the daisy wheel layout system? 12 is an important number now and much more so in the past, 12 signs of the zodiac, 12 apostles, and the measuring system in base 12. When did the metric system come into wide use in Europe? We do have 10 fingers but that is too easy.

Gabel, can you shed some light on the daisy wheel and its relation, if any?

This could be a new topic.

Tim

Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: TIMBEAL] #19555 05/08/09 12:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 217
D
Don P Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 217
My understanding of the 16" framing system is that the size of a brick was established by royal decree.(A roman "brick" took 2 men to handle, the English realized that a better way was to hold a smaller brick in one hand and a trowel in the other) Later it was decreed that a fireplace would be a minimum of 2 bricks wide. This made firewood typically 16" long. Owner builders having moved into their home's shell would while away the winter splitting and applying lath, the easiest source was the woodpile and so they studded accordingly. This came from David Lyle's "The Book of Masonry Stoves". It's the only place I've seen that story.

Re: TTRAG '09 [Re: Don P] #19557 05/08/09 02:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
OurBarns1 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 570
Great little pearl of wisdom, Don.

I burn wood, get it delivered cut & split in standard 16" length, and never considered the origin of this dimension. Fascinating.

Tim, daisy wheel / base-12, etc, would be an excellent new topic. That upcoming geometry workshop w/ Laurie Smith has me drooling. The roots of it all...

Perhaps Gabel can advise, but as I understand it, won't any dimension fit in the daisy-wheel system provided you base your wheel on that particular length to start with? I mean, there's no set wheel diameter, correct? We can use the wheel whether it's a foot wide or 15 feet wide, yes?



Don Perkins
Member, TFG


to know the trees...


Page 7 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc, Paul Freeman 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.033s Queries: 16 (0.012s) Memory: 3.2259 MB (Peak: 3.5815 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-19 16:41:17 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS