Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? #21791 11/20/09 03:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
CascadianPDX Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
Just picked up my first framing slick on Ebay and I've noticed a very slight banana bend on the business end of it. I'd estimate it at about 1/32 - 1/16". I assumed it should be flat like a chisel's back. This is fair amount of metal to remove, if it needs straightening. Should I get a smith to flatten it, grind it, send it back to seller, or keep and use it as is? I haven't had time yet to sharpen it and give it a try...

Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: CascadianPDX] #21793 11/20/09 09:31 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
M
Mark Davidson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
YES!
If it is used for framing, not finishing, the back should be flat.

Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: Mark Davidson] #21794 11/20/09 11:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
J
Jim Rogers Online Confused
Member
Online Confused
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
I'm not totally sure what Mark is saying yes to, but not all slicks are flat on the back side. Some are bent a little. This is by design and should be used this way.


Whatever you do, have fun doing it!
Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: Jim Rogers] #21795 11/20/09 12:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
I think he is saying Yes that his is flat on the back. Tools are made for independent people and there lies the heart of the issue. Use the tool and sharpen it the way it works best for you and the results you want. I see it impossible to have a truly flat back on a slick no mater how you look at it, IMO.

Tim

Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: TIMBEAL] #21796 11/20/09 02:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 895
daiku Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 895
Which direction is the curve? Is should be flat left to right, but all of mine have a slight curve front to back. I think it gives you greater control over the depth of cut. You have the ability to "climb back out" if you can push down on the handle and have the cutting edge point back up a little. My $0.02 worth. CB.


--
Clark Bremer
Minneapolis
Proud Member of the TFG
Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: TIMBEAL] #21797 11/20/09 02:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
M
Mark Davidson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
I have a slick I use for framing(joinery) that is flat on the back, so I can produce flat surfaces... This slick has a truly flat back, IMO.

I also have a slick that I use for finishing(after the adze or broadaxe) that is not so flat on the back, so I can smooth things out while minimizing tear out. The finishing slick also has a crescent shaped edge for the same reason.

Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: Mark Davidson] #21799 11/20/09 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 209
Will B Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 209
What Daiku said.
Slicks, and even framing chisels, may have a slight curve upward back-to-front on purpose. It's personal preference and you learn to work either way. If you want to hollow out slightly a broad surface like a scarf or big tenon (so that it goes flat with tangential shrinkage) the curve lets you control the cut better and climb out as necessary. A perfectly flat chisel is more likely to dig in when paring the sides of mortises, so some (not me, but Jack Sobon does) prefer a slight curve to them as well.

Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: Will B] #21800 11/20/09 10:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
I prefer a belly side to side at the cutting edge, unlike Daiku's flatness from side to side. With a straight edge against the bottom you will see a slight gap at the edges. This is where I see it is difficult to have a dead flat slick even if it was flat front to back. Still personal taste, some are more adamant about it than others.

Tim

Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: TIMBEAL] #21801 11/20/09 10:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Dave Shepard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
My slick has a curve in three directions. From side to side. From the cutting edge towards the handle, and the cutting edge itself is a radius. I had my slick sharpened by a retired machinest. It was absolutely flat, square and perfect, and almost unusable.


Member, Timber Framers Guild
Re: Should a framing slick have a perfectly flat back? [Re: Dave Shepard] #21803 11/21/09 05:21 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
CascadianPDX Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
Well bloody hell, that's a lot of encouraging advice. I think I'll use it as is, and probably like it a lot. I can always flatten it a little bit if necessary. Thanks all!


Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.029s Queries: 15 (0.008s) Memory: 3.1808 MB (Peak: 3.3977 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-24 17:26:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS