Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Feasibility phase questions [Re: Ken Hume] #22673 02/14/10 06:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
C
counselorpaul Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
Thanks Ken. That's good to hear. I think our trees are in that age range. While curing the trees in the woods after cutting, should the bark be peeled off?

Re: Feasibility phase questions [Re: brad_bb] #22674 02/14/10 06:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
C
counselorpaul Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
Brad, no, I am fixed on post and beam. Did I say something to give a different impression?

Re: Feasibility phase questions [Re: counselorpaul] #22688 02/16/10 04:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 603
brad_bb Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 603
When you start talking about gunstock posts, and curves, and wiggles, it makes me think of conventional TF. Not sure I've seen gunstocks in a post and beam so a little hard to picture. The curves and wiggles make me think of scribing.

Re: Feasibility phase questions [Re: brad_bb] #22690 02/16/10 11:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
Me too, Brad. Post are flared to accommodate joinery. Wiggles will complicate metal brackets.

Tim

Re: Feasibility phase questions [Re: TIMBEAL] #22693 02/16/10 06:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
T
Tim Reilly Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Hey counselorpaul, it sounds wonderful what you are doing. Go after you dreams! I just recently moved into my own traditional timber frame/strawbale home after almost 4 year of hard work. Man does it feel good to live in a home that I built with my own two hands. The road ahead will be hard and bumpy, but stick with it! You can do it! Best of luck with everything :-)

Tim

Re: Feasibility phase questions [Re: TIMBEAL] #22694 02/16/10 06:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
C
counselorpaul Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
ah Gotcha. Yes, wiggles might make more sense in post and beam with round posts. Gunstocks squared off might be more aesthetic if the beam is wider than the non-flared part of the post. It would make for a better connection for the brackets as well. Thanks.

Last edited by counselorpaul; 02/16/10 06:21 PM.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.031s Queries: 15 (0.008s) Memory: 3.1811 MB (Peak: 3.5815 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-28 22:56:08 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS