Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: flattening backs [Re: Mark Davidson] #22917 03/03/10 01:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 895
daiku Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 895
Are these laminated chisels that you are flatteing with hammer on teh anvil? I would think the hardened layer on the back would not tolerate that kind of impact. CB.


--
Clark Bremer
Minneapolis
Proud Member of the TFG
Re: flattening backs [Re: Mark Davidson] #22918 03/03/10 01:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
J
Jim Rogers Online Confused
Member
Online Confused
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,687
Brad:
Tom is here and I asked him about your question.
He says he uses a very coarse (240 grit) Japanese water stone to flatten the backs after the belt sander.

You only need to flatten the first few inches.

Also, he does not recommend cold hammering, especially on laminated chisels.

Jim Rogers



Whatever you do, have fun doing it!
Re: flattening backs [Re: Jim Rogers] #22922 03/03/10 05:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 305
T
timberwrestler Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 305
From the Japanese tool perspective (which use laminated steel), planes, chisels, and other laminated blades can be tapped out. This is done by very carefully tapping on the soft steel right above the lamination line. A much smaller hammer is used than what Mark's ball peen. This effectively bends the hard steel, but the force is dampened by the soft steel. The back of the blade is then lapped flat again. Cracked blades still happen.

I know a bit about the metal in Japanese tools, but really nothing on what was used in American or European laminated chisels. I mainly use Japanese chisels because I've yet to find a western chisel that holds an edge like my Tasai chisels. I like the weight and style of antique framing chisels, but I like the steel in the Japanese. It would be great if Barr could make a real framing chisel (as opposed to the firmer style he's got).

Re: flattening backs [Re: timberwrestler] #22932 03/03/10 10:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
M
Mark Davidson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
I started "tapping out" with japanese chisels, then started using the technique whenever I saw the back falling away just short of the edge, a common situation. Although the photo shows a big hammer, I don't swing it very hard.
I've probably tried the hammer on 20 or 30 different chisels and a couple of broadaxes, and only had a bad crack once, on an older laminated framing chisel... for me it's a fun technique, put on the ear protection and tap away for a bit. The real benefit for me is that it will produce a very flat back, which I like. It sounds as though there are not that many who like a flat back here, so the hammer is probably not going to apply.

Re: flattening backs [Re: Mark Davidson] #22934 03/03/10 11:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
Dave Shepard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 718
TW, I agree. The quality of the Barr tools is awesome, both the steel and the workmanship. However, they just aren't shaped the way I like/am used to. How do your Japanese chisels hold up regarding chipping? It's always a trade-off. Japanese tools tend to run about 60-62 Rockwell, and American stuff around 58. I am always lapping the backs of my old chisels as I sharpen them. I figure a little at a time will keep the polished part advancing along as I use the tool. I don't think you use up much chisel, unless you're hitting a lot of hardware.

Last edited by Dave Shepard; 03/03/10 11:28 PM.

Member, Timber Framers Guild
Re: flattening backs [Re: Dave Shepard] #22964 03/05/10 10:46 PM
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 171
C
Chris Hall Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 171
If I might offer something to this discussion...

It's not standard practice to tap out Japanese chisels, only the plane blades. The reason being that the Japanese plane blade is a compound-tapered form, and fitted precisely to the wood block, or dai, which carries it. Thus removing too much metal from the back flat of the blade to re-establish the hollow would result in a spoiling of the fit of the blade to the block. For that case, tapping out, ura-dashi, is necessary.

With a chisel, there is no fit issue to worry about, so when the bevel edge approaches the edge of the hollow on the back after repeated re-sharpenings, the normal process is to simply re-flatten the back to establish a good hollow again. This re-flattening is a sequential process up through the grits, concentrating most of the strokes on the stone to the last 1 cm of the blade (being careful not to create a step in the blade's back). You don't want to flatten the entire back evenly when re-establishing the hollow, as this prematurely thins out the cutting steel. The pressure while re-flattening needs to be concentrated at the tip of the blade as mentioned. The ideal is to carefully maintain the hollow so that the cutting steel lasts all the way to the shank of the chisel.

As for Japanese tools and 'chipping', that is a question that revolves around the bevel angle more than anything else. A lot of Japanese indigenous woodwork involves softwoods and the chisels you buy from the tool seller are often factory ground with that sort of material in mind - that is, with fairly acute cutting angles. If the chisel edge is prone to chipping, then steepen the bevel until the problem goes away. I have lots of chisels from many different makers and have never encountered significant problem with chipping, though I have received new chisels with a very acute bevel angle that needed re-configuring prior to use.

I recently worked a bunch of Wenge and found a couple of my chisel edges weren't standing up as well as normal (Wenge has a working quality akin to granite), so I steepened the bevels by a couple of degrees and the problem disappeared. If I work with a bunch of softer material next, I'll make the bevels on those same chisels a bit more acute again to obtain the cleanest cut.

Further, some chisels end up with a slightly brittle edge after the tempering process is done as the heating of the blade and quenching have more intense effects down towards the bevel edge, unlike further up where there is more metal mass to absorb the heat. Here is where the blacksmiths skill really can make a difference. This over-heated edge problem tends to be phenomenon more associated to the less-expensive and more mass-produced products, however a chisel or plane blade that is at bit too hard and prone to chipping may only be like that for the first couple of mm of blade, and after that much better.

Conversely, a blade that does not chip at all may stand having its bevel angle pushed down a degree or two - there is a sweet spot for every blade and the material it is worked upon.

Those switching back and forth frequently between different woods of different working qualities will benefit from having dedicated chisel and plane sets, one for softer materials, and one for harder.

As for flattening the backs of large western chisels, um, been there done that and no thanks! Life is too short. It really is an advantage to have a hollowed back on an edge tool for the ease of flattening.

I had a bunch of Barr chisels and drawknives once, and though though it is nice to find a handmade black-smithed product in the West (and I very much wanted to support that) I didn't find the cutting edge as good as my Japanese tools, both in terms of ultimate sharpness and in respect to how well the tool held it's edge. So, I sold all my Barr stuff. I've had similar experiences with a few European planes as well - the cutting steel just doesn't quite, er, cut it.

Last edited by Chris Hall; 03/05/10 10:52 PM. Reason: fine tuning

My blog on carpentry practice, East and West:

https://thecarpentryway.blog
Re: flattening backs [Re: Chris Hall] #22965 03/05/10 11:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
I just like how easy the Barr tools sharpen, it's simple with little effort, yes I sharpen more often, I don't mind. I like a hollow grind on the bevel, though.

I also don't like the backs of my chisel to be "flat". I like them to be similar to my slick, a mini slick if you will.

Maybe could find a worn spot on my anvil to tap a sag into my chisels, maybe. I will just put that on the back burner for now.

Tim


Re: flattening backs [Re: Mark Davidson] #22985 03/09/10 01:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 242
T
timber brained Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
T
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 242
Pretty much what Mark said. If there are areas that are higher on the back then the edge, then as you hone only these areas will be honed leaving that edge rough. Mo, this slick came extremely rough. All I need is to grind down the back enough so that the edge is honed smooth.Any other hollows I dont care about. Unfortunately this slick was pretty out of wack, as the middle of it was much higher than the ends( socket end and cutting edge)In order to get to the edge I have ground down this middle portion.
I thought about hollow grinding it down like Japanese chisels but I was already so far along. I dont use machines for sharpening as the stones usually do the job.
I have been meaning to get a piece of float glass and some silicon carbide papers. It seems like a good fix for some jobs. I always wondered if you were putting some elbow grease into the grinding, is the glass strong enough to not break? How thick should it be? float or plate glass? thanks all. tb

Re: flattening backs [Re: timber brained] #22986 03/09/10 02:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 242
T
timber brained Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
T
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 242
Which Japanese chisels are you referring to. Is there a specific make that you like and find available in the US ?
I am with you Mark. I like my chisels flat. I like to uses them as straight edges when cutting if I dont feel like picking up my square. tb

Last edited by timber brained; 03/09/10 02:21 PM.
Re: flattening backs [Re: timber brained] #23002 03/11/10 01:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
timber brained, if you were to put a straight edge on the back of the slick, parallel to the cutting edge and 1/2" away from the edge, it should be dead flat? Is this the hump you wanted to remove?

Tim

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 16 (0.026s) Memory: 3.2229 MB (Peak: 3.5814 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-20 06:14:55 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS