Respectfully, I would appreciate if politics didn't sour our discussion. That's a subject that can easily get out of hand and upset people, especially on the internet where it is difficult to tell whether someone is simply joking or insulting another.
Now, on topic (at least sort of)
First, I need to retract a previous statement. I was in error on my comment about scissor trusses. I had another system in mind when I said that, and got the two confused. There is an older style of truss joinery employed during the Anglo Saxon, Norman, and transition periods that relies heavily on half dovetails, because there are members that are designed to at times be in tension.
The subject of the development of joinery is interesting. One of the appendices to English Historic Carpentry contains a discussion of the development of the unwithdrawable lap joint, it discusses it as a sophisticated, important joint. It is a joint that serves a purpose that the mortise and tenon cannot. And the mortise and tenon functions in ways that this brace cannot.
I think we do well to remember this joint, and what its advantages are.
Lapped dovetails also provide an advantage in that they can be inserted after other framing members have been assembled and pegged.
And as a side note, are there enough of you that would like to see some of my conclusions regarding traditional Swiss (Lower Bernese) carpentry to justify writing it up and posting it on these forums? (I don't have a website, guess I am behind the times. Which is OK I guess for an Anabaptist, right?)