Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: Jay White Cloud] #30354 02/24/13 06:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
D Wagstaff Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
Yep. So what.

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: D Wagstaff] #30355 02/24/13 07:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Jay White Cloud Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Quote:
Yep. So what.
So how is a picaroon germane to turning timber over timbers in a beam shop. I was just wondering if I didn't understand your statement. Picaroons are not a timber framing tool as much as a logging and milling tool, as each time you strike with one to "bite" the log or timber, it marks it considerably. This would not work in any timber framing shop I know of.

Regards,

Jay

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: Jay White Cloud] #30356 02/24/13 07:16 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
D Wagstaff Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
Maybe it's time for a shift then.
Personally, any evidence of honest and true work left behind from the process doesn't bother me at all.

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: Jay White Cloud] #30357 02/24/13 07:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
T
TIMBEAL Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,882
Hi Jay, I assume you are referencing modern shops. If I am not mistaken there are pick pole divots exposed on older frames, from raising. I am not sure how one would use a picaroon to roll timber. I use my cant hooks for turning timber, digs will show. I also have dirt smug, tire tracks, foot prints, mud, blood and things I can't explain on some finished frames. And heaven forbid the timber should check. Just saying there are a lot of ways to embellish a finished frame, it is part of the art.

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: TIMBEAL] #30358 02/24/13 07:59 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Jay White Cloud Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Quote:
I also have dirt smug, tire tracks, foot prints, mud, blood and things I can't explain on some finished frames.
I love this stuff... whistle We managed once to have a perfect set of kitty tracks that looked like they had stepped in the ink pot, going down the side of a main beam. When every thing got clean up and oiled we left them...it was beautiful, and speaks to the reality of a hand cut frame.

I use a cank hook for turning also, if it is one of those planed and highly finished frames, I will use a pad or beam wrench. Picaroons are, as stated before for milling and logging, they aren't a timber framing tool in general and are for dragging and sorting a lot of stock as it is coming off a mill. Wood grading is where I use it the most or sorting firewood and barn boards.

Quote:
Maybe it's time for a shift then. Personally, any evidence of honest and true work left behind from the process doesn't bother me at all.
If I'm doing a historical project, such as an old barn, mill or ware house, these "turning and lifting scares" are more than appropriate. If I am doing a vintage japanese farm house they are not. The Asians still routinely (especially in Japanese,) warp their timber is paper, just to protect the patina. The Koreans will go as far as gluing the paper to the framing members.

On many modern frames, protecting this patina is also important for the style of frame being produce.

Regards,

jay

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: Jay White Cloud] #30359 02/25/13 09:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
D Wagstaff Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
Hello,

Picaroons, in this area, are a more varied implement than they are outside the European mainland I guess. Here there are about a hundred different versions, (I just write a hundred for the sake of imagery, not to stake a claim) of all sizes, forms and material. Still, for whatever it is worth, picaroons are not typical for timber framing, but then timber framing is a construct that has different meanings from place to place. For example here it does not exist. There is just not enough call for it as an independent trade and someone doing only timber framing work would no doubt go hungry I'm afraid.

But anyway, a part of timber framing is converting logs to timbers and some people do it with their axes and this would provide an excellent place for the picaroon, (I wish I had had mine the last time I was a hewing). Even in other situations many uses are evident in a timber framing context and a sharp picaroon with the right geometry is handy in moving around timbers of many sizes, even grabbing them from the end grain or inside a mortice if you choose. Still, such marks on even a prominent surface, no matter what the building is, should not be a problem - even the Shintos recognize and celebrate imperfection - with a recognition that there is a division between the honest consequences as a result of the process and a contrived effect.

I opened a box of clay tiles once and there was a series of cat paw imprints where a cat had walked across the wet clay, and felt lucky that I'd gotten that box. Also here, in the cement floor in what used to be the attached stall part at the back of the house, I can trace where a cat walked maybe a hundred years back.

Greetings,

Don Wagstaff

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: D Wagstaff] #30360 02/25/13 06:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Jay White Cloud Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Quote:
but then timber framing is a construct that has different meanings from place to place. For example here it does not exist. There is just not enough call for it as an independent trade and someone doing only timber framing work would no doubt go hungry I'm afraid.
Hello Don,

I'm a bit confused by this statement, I know of a number of timber framers in the Netherlands, and there are young ones jumping up every year, trying to learn the craft. I'm corresponding with a few currently, one is building a green house. Just over the border in Germany or Frances, they are all over the place. Many of the young farmers are also picking up the trade, just to take care of old building and add to them on there small organic farms. I haven't even gotten to the huge industry of historical restoration, which has many working member throughout Europe.

Regards,

jay

Last edited by Jay White Cloud; 02/25/13 06:16 PM.
Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: Jay White Cloud] #30361 02/25/13 09:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
D Wagstaff Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
Hello Jay,

The simple answer is this, it is not the case that there are no people doing timber framing in the Netherlands, it's just that they would call themselves carpenters the same way people building an office building or standard houses, would call themselves carpenters.

There are in fact many, what to my sense of the matter is, exceptionally talented people restoring windmills, church towers, farm complexes, all that kind of thing here. You see my point was more about labels than activity in reacting to what you said about, so called "picaroons" not being a timber framing tool, both in fact, picaroons and timber framing, are constructs or made up concepts with more or less meaning depending on where, in space and time, you happen to be. A picaroon, here in Holland, does not exist or is at least irrelevant. That is not to say there is not a tool on a stick with a bird-head-looking point for grabbing logs, if you understand what I mean.

Greetings,

Don Wagstaff

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: D Wagstaff] #30362 02/26/13 11:30 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 133
J
Jon Senior Offline
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 133
Jay: In the US (as I understand it), the vast majority of new builds are stud frame. This means that pretty much all builders count (in a technical sense) as carpenters. In that environment, it's useful to distinguish between someone who nails little timbers together, and someone who cuts traditional joints in large timbers.

In France (and the UK, I can't speak for the Netherlands), most new builds are brick / blockwork. Carpentry (in the large part) is limited to the roof structures (Even first floors are often poured concrete here in France). Even in Normandy where timber structures form the backbone of almost all buildings older than 150 years, very few carpentry firms can afford to specialise in large timber construction. Consequently there is no real "timber framing" industry here. Just varying degrees of carpentry.

The point that Don is making (I believe) is that labelling a tool as being a "timber framing" tool or not is only relevant when "timber framing" is a useful label. The distinction is not so clear here*.

* Many stud frames here in France incorporate some post and beam work in place of internal supporting walls. The post and beam work is not self-supporting, but neither are the stud frame walls. Timber framing or stick framing?

Re: Turning the Timbers [Re: Jon Senior] #30371 02/28/13 07:47 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
D Wagstaff Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 273
But here is a handy aid in tilting in place of turning

(click for movie)

That said because there are two options for lifting, with the claw from under or the fork mounted at the top, by positioning it at the side of a timber, flipping is possible. Disadvantage is, this thing is heavy.

Greetings,

Don Wagstaff

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jim Rogers, mdfinc 

Newest Members
Bradyhas1, cpgoody, James_Fargeaux, HFT, Wrongthinker
5137 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.141s Queries: 15 (0.079s) Memory: 3.2243 MB (Peak: 3.3980 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-24 14:36:14 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS